Generalized sexuality as
transfer of information
in natural cycles
Generalized sexuality as
transfer of information
in natural cycles

Generating new dimensions may be a particularly important aspect of development in singularities in transitions between generations. Collapsing galaxies could inoculate black holes with possibly modulated gamma-ray bursts (GRB), and correspondingly elementary particles in similar way other particles or states with radiation quanta carrying information. Sexuality with the transfer of information between generations seems to characterize generally viable life as adaptable circular processes and to close slightly changed cycles.
LongRead
Development
of new dimensions
By “genuine” development let us
understand that something completely new and unexpected will come up
with it. A small external influence may lead to greater consecutive
development, initially thought to occur in familiar dimensions of
space and time, but perhaps also in completely different and also in
unforeseen areas of the world and life. A generalized conjecture or
statement can only be fulfilled with content if meaningful
specialization is possible. However, further possible or necessary
questions can lead to restrictions. This points to a more
comprehensive and not necessarily rational philosophy, which could
thus give it a stronger position compared to sciences based on direct
experimental evidence. If, for example, logical decisions do not lead
directly to a result, recourse to recursion should be considered,
i.e. approximation in small steps towards something not fully known,
possibly involving only tiny impacts from the outside of a system.
In principle, life thus seems to be possible everywhere and at
any time, so that even the whole world can even be conceived as a
living being. Both stars and enzymes do not meet all the conditions
that are considered necessary for human life, but perhaps much more
important for them are various other such conditions. However, there
are no limits to human questions, and the search for life in the
macro and micro world is becoming increasingly interesting, i.e.
research targetting galaxies and/or elementary particles.
Purely
statistical movement in any sense within a theoretically completely
closed system does not allow such development because a vectorial,
i.e. predominantly one-sided influence would be a prerequisite.
Presumably an incompletely closed system must exist or be accepted as
a model for the universe. “Genuine” development that can expand
“creatively” and thus go beyond the existing limitations within
the system may only need a small external influence, which means that
this situation inevitably differs from regulated evolution and
growth. But we cannot "look" outside of the system forming
the "universe", where another area would have to exist.
We
live in a not completely known medium like fish in water. Within it
we as living beings also form a system ourselves. The arguments for
lack of closure also apply to us. The main aspect must therefore
focus on interaction. Even peripheral areas of the universal system
are only accessible with indirect methods, which means limitation to
recursion or simulation. Establishing or defining boundary conditions
in classic calculus can be interpreted, for example, as a workaround
for this difficulty.
The uncertainty principle by W. Heisenberg and the mathematical work on fuzzy logic by L.A. Zadeh seem
to make it impossible to provide precise evidence of generalizing
conclusions under natural conditions, because in the end, these any
approaches are likely to use them indirectly. The presupposition of
rationality ignores singularities in a presumably impermissible way.
The limitations, which have been known for a long time, cause being
unable to clearly recognize a certain dimension at the same time as
another one (e.g. impossible square squaring or understanding the
earth as an approximate sphere).
It seems more important than
ever how to introduce axiomatics and whether this is only possible
step by step. In classical mechanics, when describing vibrations by
complex numbers the time is called imaginary, which is further
elaborated in quantum mechanics. Since time has only one coordinate
and space has three, preference should be given to a model in which
space is only designed in a subsequent step following time.
Consistency would be an important request for the introduction of
axiomatics possibly influenced by intuition. Not in contradiction to
the present context, time could be understood as parental generation
of three real spatial coordinates, which form a kind of triplet. Such
a division, which is in principle would have to be fuzzy, should meet
the conditions of De Broglie's experiments, which of course depend on
the type of a quantization to be considered.
Physics means a description of nature, by which in classical-philosophical context the existence could initially be understood. In classical physics, description of nature begins with the introduction of spatial dimensions. Thereafter, however, development being too vaguely defined was included in that description, namely with insufficient distinction from evolution and growth. If we are looking for dimensions of development now, that could accept the possibility of a kind of recursion between existence and developments. Asking such an unorthodox question, however, we begin to merge physics and philosophy. But only doing this we likely can ask what general "genuine" development may be.
The
classic approach to physics is to first define or select axioms that
meet basic requirements (essentially mathematical and logical) and
assumptions, which are consistent with given constants of order zero
(D0). A linear force called impulse and thus first-order mechanics
can be added to these by often neglecting or ignoring external
influence. The resulting dimension “one” (D1) can be described as
static and therefore be assigned to corresponding static interaction.
Static in this sense means that mathematically only constant and
linear terms are taken into account, but not quadratic terms. At this
stage, only friction, but no feedback, is taken into account. This
means restriction to close range.
In a subsequent step by
allowing multidirectional influence from outside (vectorial
disturbances), which could lead to circular movements and feedback,
oscillations and fields can be considered, which lead to a dimension
being referred to in this context as dynamic (D2) and is described
using also quadratic or second order terms.
In a third step,
movements of spatial bodies now show attraction under weak, but
probably not negligible influence of torque (spin) and undergo
trajectories increasingly influenced by transformation between mass
and energy according to the Einstein law. When these become more
complex, they also form spirals and vortices that generate
far-reaching angular momentum fields that, for example, can form a
network of electric and magnetic fields with practically any range,
according to the Maxwell equations. The descriptive use of the words
"divergence" and in particular "rotation" in
describing those equations can or could actually have been
significant and even pioneering in the past. The result is a
dimension here called dynamic (D3).
Angular momentum fields of
these vortices are usually described by a sum of vectors for total
rotation and of particle spin. This latter magnetic part causes
radiation in the vertical direction according to the right-hand rule.
Being conscious of limited own knowledge, however, little seems to be
known about the energy that is released by strongly growing air
vortices in mostly tropical tornadoes and where it disappears when,
for example, the air vortex dissipates energy by friction and also
through lightning. This situation could be more or less the same in
the macro world of galaxies or in the micro world of spin of
elementary particles. But in the latter two cases, it remains
difficult to prove the way of disappearance of this energy. Often
hypothetical assumption of supposedly unknown forms of matter and
type of energy are required that should constitute large portions of
the energy that is calculated to exist in the world. Behind it, there
are unresolved problems of an unknown interaction between what is
known as dark matter and dark energy. The term may also apply to our
knowledge, although the restriction to a purely rational approach may
play an important role.
Increasingly
deformed unstable galaxies
Over time, the vortex of a
galaxy, or perhaps even the entire universe, takes on more and more
angular momentum. This can become the cause of its deformation. An
initially rather flat spiral releases energy mainly on one side.
One-sided bulging can be clearly observed on images of galaxies. They
rotate in a stable form as long as the two strongest main components
of the angular momentum vector are at their extreme opposite ends.
But the middle section could grow, causing instability.
The
Russian cosmonaut V.A. Dzhanibekov observed sudden, very surprising
change of direction of bodies that fly and rotate in smooth space. If
such bodies have a different shape in all three spatial dimensions,
the central component of the angular momentum can possibly become
stronger than those at the opposite ends. Radiation can causes in
galaxies a comparatively large loss of energy perpendicular to their
main plane, which is not dissipated by friction. They appear thereby
to literally become thick-bellied and to force enormous singularities
in an unusual way, because a change of direction can only occur in
systems that are not too large due to the high inertia.
Under
such conditions, galaxies or even more the universe are unable to
make such an enormous change of direction. Therefore, a huge
singularity that completely dissolves the vortex could cause the
death of these enormous structures. Only the angular momentum vector
is conserved. However, this vector is composed, for example in cgs
dimensions, of the two factors effect and time. In addition to these
two parts, one could imagine that such a resolution also creates a
background that serves as a disturbance in the subsequent formation
of new units and could be noticeable as background radiation.
After
such formation of increasingly unstable vortices and radiation
emanating from them, the three-stage process so far obviously must
not have to end at this point. This entices to imagine a cycle that
would have to be linked to the beginning and could mean that when
axiomatic laws and constants are generated or rather transferred from
previous vortices, their values may change slightly while these
seem to disappear, but do actually only change and just transform.
They can again provide time and energy to start a new static cycle by
mainly providing the two components mentioned, which are conserved in
the huge transmitted angular momentum vector.
Such
a large and, in relation to the size, extremely sudden event has to
go on with impulsive emission of enormous amounts of radiation. This
can be a possible source or explanation for particularly powerful
gamma-ray bursts (GRB). Their observed afterglow over wide frequency
ranges could possibly thus be explained particularly in cases that
cannot be attributed to the formation of black holes by collapsing
dying stars or colliding neutron stars. Such an explanation can be
combined with the fact that such GRBs usually do not originate in the
Milky Way. Depending on their size and type, they can be caused by
different kinds of explosions. Supernovae (dying “normal” stars)
and kilonovae (neutron stars hitting each other) are largely
recognized causes. Collapsing galaxies could be a third option.
One
could perhaps imagine a world with hithert6 unimaginable creatures in
an unknown medium, possibly kind of neutrinos and photons that
interact in a similar way to atoms with weak interactions between
them, like molecules in water as a medium for fish, but in this case
compatible with the Einstein formula, which would require a quantized
balance between matter and energy.
Such ideas could immediately
be dismissed as unacceptable speculation, but at least might have
heuristic value. Recently possible support is found in new
measurements of the Hubble constant for the expansion of the
universe. It turns out that this speed is significantly different
when measured near our galaxy or far away in the universe.
This
may make us more inclined to conceive that circular processes take
place without needing scientific justification to talk about not
necessarily defined terms such as creation and annihilation. In the
context mentioned, those traditional concepts appear to be far more
speculative and less justified than the comparatively general and
consistent axiomatic approaches mentioned above. In contrast to the
concept of creation, they can be narrowed down to form at least an
approximate orientation system for purposes in life situations that
could be conceived in more general way as so far. For important laws
of nature, their existence must not be assumed from the outset, but
rather their emergence from possible "structuring chaos"
could happen, ie from angular momentum vectors that convey energy and
information.
If we add that development can often be better
described by successive steps of generations rather than in the
course of time, thereby we arrive at fractal ideas. These make a
connection seem possible with the double helix DNA as information
carriers of our life. DNA could be imagined as a distant fractal
child of the vortices discussed above.
The concept itself seems
fuzzy. This is not meant to be a joke. Existence and development in
the above concept could only be understood under conditions of
uncertainty, which unfortunately are often not very benevolently
misunderstood in human life as synonymous with insecurity or
inability. However, since said system-inherent uncertainty is very
little accepted in our current institutions, for example, such
concepts have been and are still being avoided there and also in the
perhaps too well-established peer review system and in addition
reflected by unpleasant personal experiences.
Semipermeable
boundaries as part of development
At this point, and a
point is something without a dimension or of dimension zero (D0) in
the designation chosen here, the question of limits or borders again
arises. The boundary that seems philosophically most acceptable in
this context is between existence and development. Falling back into
logic, one could postulate a triplet conceived as a real one, which
can be formed in a singularity as new real parent generation through
quantum leap in imaginary time or fractal generation step, resulting
in existence, a interactive border zone and development. An external
influence that affects this border cannot be excluded. New existence
and development can arise on both sides of a slightly changed border,
in principle like elementary particles with positive and negative
spin. The border thus appears as catalyst for new development.
As
a model, we could cite photosynthesis on a membrane under irradiation
with sunlight, whereby considerable amounts of energy are generated
from "tiny" photons. One could then imagine that such a
triplet enters a next generation through a singularity, the result of
which is divided into new realizations of changed existence, new
interactive boundaries and changed development.
This is
astonishingly similar to necessarily singular events that are
essential in transitions between successive fractal generations. So
there is no need to consider idea of creation or apocalypse,
but only of singularities in active border areas between generations,
entirely in accordance with the "known" transitions between
birth and death. Macroscopic boundaries must also in principle have,
for example from an axiomatic point of view, as in quantum mechanics
fringe-like edge zones with possible holes, channels, perforations, a
limited height or whatever types of permeability, since no closed
system can be assumed in nature as shown by strongly penetrating
neutrons. A gentle “police”, ie fine-grained regulation
“mechanisms”, could possibly reduce the influence of
discontinuities. The fate of a system is likely to depend heavily on
adaptable control mechanisms. But how might we see or how should or
how could these in principle interactive borders “look”? They
ought to be comparable with spatial boundaries between houses or
countries or planets, or with boundaries that limit the time between
epochs such as the Middle Ages and the future or between young people
and adults. Our voting rights or the time of retirement come to mind,
and even interactions between cultures, fields of work, languages,
genders, feelings, art forms, old traces or similar social aspects,
or all of these even as superposition of such contributions.
Transformation
of dimensions
In nature, borders areas can thus generally be
considered as being partially fuzzy and must be at least weakly
permeable. As a reverse consequence of such limits, life itself must
be at least a bit fuzzy and could benefit from this situation. The
concept of life itself cannot thus be defined in a purely rational
way. Such structure allows, for example, to conceive meaningful
aesthetics, beautiful movements, beautiful music, beautifully
changing colors or landscapes. This applies to ourselves, but also to
creatures, plants and animals, to partners, children and imagination,
and also to everything or everyone who might want to weaken
boundaries that are likely to make sense, for example for coming
along with poisons or anarchists. Only in oresence of partially
permeable border areas can weak poisons act as medication and
supposed anarchists as very useful nomads who are able to establish
unexpected new ideas with a notebook on a tropical palm beach.
In
a society neither completely rigid rules nor absolute
responsibilities must be fixed exclusively by exact rational methods,
nor can this be done for climate change, which does not exist as
isolated phenomenon, or for extreme economic polarization. All
supposedly four dimensions that are likely to encompass our lives
could be a little fuzzy. Exclusive rationality is not imperative, but
must coexist with feelings, claims to assertiveness and activities.
This does not at all mean that rationality is bad or unnecessary.
However, those other parts must be added and allowed, which leads to
a more complex superposition. This would correspond to the
traditional idea that our life can be felt as part of a nature of
unimaginable breadth and as divinely beautiful.
In principle,
however, four dimensions should also be sufficient for the
description in other coordinates, as for example cultural
designations in space-time coordinates by natural sciences. As a
matter of facts this is certainly not yet sufficiently possible at
least up to now.
However, dimensions of dimensions themselves
appear to be a new concept that can only be conceived recursively,
namely from constant to static to dynamic to turbulent. Consecutively
and likely with consistency it appears they could be combined again
and again from turbulence to new static states in renewing cycles.
This might be astonishingly similar in phenotypical terms to both the
human phases of life and, at least with increasing approximation, to
those of higher animals that appear to be less different from humans
than formerly thought.
Sexuality
as information transfer in singularities
Higher dimensions
cannot generally be derived directly from previous ones, as is
evident, for example, from impossible squaring of a circle. The
transmission of information between successive generations is
therefore of particular importance. Between these there are
necessarily singularities of whatever kind. Since the additional
information cannot have been comprised in the dimension(s) of the
original generation, a new dimension may be added. In principle, this
can create an infinite series of generations. The evolution of living
things on Earth stores additional information about many subsequent
generations on longer and longer DNA double helix. But overall,
nature is obviously, like higher organisms on Earth and especially
humans, not only ecologically but also economically minded. You
yourself or our way of thinking obviously prefer simple splitting or
the less known triplet formation and get thus along with just four
dimensions. Possibly appearing as trick, but basically and
consistently being an adaptive kind of feedback, sexuality in general
enables a “turbulent” phase to be coupled to a new “constant”
phase. In higher earthly beings, this ts referred as death and birth
and comes about by transmission of DNA in sperm to egg cells. In the
macro and in the micro world, this seems to go on in quite comparable
way. GRBs might be modulated carriers of information. The widely
varying and, according to recent findings, hardly ever the same pulse
form of these cosmic flashes can indicate this without us being able
to recognize a coding. In the micro range, a similar situation could
be hidden behind observed uncertainty for example between particles
and waves.
We are for sure still far from the end of possible
research in this area. However, it seems to be confirmed again and
again and everywhere, even if this may sound too absolute, that
nature may not be the same under all circumstances, but is
nevertheless subject to the same principles. These do not have to
coincide with religious beliefs. With them people would like to come
closer to presumed, but not known and, in particular, not rationally
provable insights or support, as now is tried with recursive
approach.
My own impression is that in every major world
religion a certain dimension is emphasized, but without equally
taking the others into account. Archaic religions emphasize constancy
as the first and main step. The following religions, which apparently
could tend towards fundamentalism, rely in the figurative sense above
all on stability, i.e. the statics of their basic works. A third kind
of such development emphasizes the dynamic of the interaction between
individuals in the form of not strictly definable “values” such
as freedom and love, and a fourth group, apparently outside of them,
emphasizes the cyclical of all life.
Classical philosophy could
have similar concepts. In its initial forms it serves to establish a
constant basis, in the humanities it is more a static underpinning of
material or ideal constructs, in still more recent form already
influenced by sciences it emphasizes dynamic interactions between
different domains, and as nowadays it shows an increasing interest in
not only rational, but above all cyclical processes , as they also
occur in technology and business.
As an overall trend,
transmissible boundaries can be observed not only between individual
areas such as departments or countries, but also an astonishingly
high degree of permeability in nature, which we also have to account
for, as obviously shown by skin. In theory, borders can be
understood as sharp, but in practice of nature they represent border
areas with a certain extent often having own properties. They are now
particularly worthy of interest because of the opportunities they
offer for both positive creativity and resolution of negative
conflicts.
© All rights by Hans J. Unsoeld Berlin 2020
200811